Home / Documentation / Transverse Efficiency ($K_{tru}$)

Strength • Section 9.2.3

Lug Transverse Efficiency Factors ($K_{tru}$ & $K_{try}$)

AFFDL-TR-69-42 Section 9.2.3 transverse allowable, Figure 9-8 curves, and yield vs ultimate governing rules

Interactive Transverse Curve

Plot your lug's $h_{avg}/D$ operating point against USAF Figure 9-8 directly in the web calculator.

Open Web Calculator →

1. Mechanics of Transverse Lug Loading

When the applied load $P_{tr}$ acts perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the lug, the connection undergoes complex combined stresses:

  • Bearing and compressive crushing directly beneath the pin on the loaded side.
  • High shear stresses causing diagonal shear tear-out along the $45^\circ$ forward section ($h_1$).
  • Bending and tensile cracking on the trailing ligament ($h_3$) due to pin moment rotation.

To resolve these three coupled mechanisms without requiring 3D finite element simulation, Section 9.2.3 of USAF AFFDL-TR-69-42 consolidates the transverse capacity through the harmonic mean dimension $h_{avg}$ and Figure 9-8.

2. USAF Transverse Strength Formulations (Equations 9-8a & 9-8b)

The calculation engine evaluates whether the alloy's ultimate tensile strength or yield strength governs:

Condition Governing Allowable Formula Efficiency Factor Used
Case 1: $F_{tu} \le 1.304 \cdot F_{ty}$
(Ductile alloys, e.g. 7075-T6, Ti-6Al-4V)
$P_{tru,L} = K_{tru} \cdot F_{tu} \cdot D \cdot t$ $K_{tru}$ (Ultimate transverse efficiency from Fig. 9-8)
Case 2: $F_{tu} > 1.304 \cdot F_{ty}$
(High yield-spread alloys, e.g. annealed stainless)
$P_{tru,L} = 1.304 \cdot K_{try} \cdot F_{ty} \cdot D \cdot t$ $K_{try}$ (Yield transverse efficiency from Fig. 9-8)

In both cases, if an inner bushing is installed, the bushing allowable compressive load is also checked ($P_{tru,B} = 1.304 \cdot F_{cy,bush} \cdot D_p \cdot t$). The governing transverse allowable is:

$$P_{tru,LB} = \min\left(P_{tru,L},\; P_{tru,B}\right)$$

3. Characteristics of USAF Figure 9-8

Figure 9-8 plots both $K_{tru}$ (upper curve) and $K_{try}$ (lower curve) against the dimensionless ratio $h_{avg}/D$:

  • Range: $0.0 \le h_{avg}/D \le 1.6$.
  • Initial Steep Slope ($0 \le h_{avg}/D \le 0.8$): Transverse strength grows almost linearly with effective edge material.
  • Plateau ($h_{avg}/D > 1.2$): The efficiency curves flatten out asymptotically near $K_{tru} \approx 1.0 - 1.1$. Adding more material beyond $h_{avg}/D \approx 1.2$ yields little additional transverse capacity.

4. Practical Design Recommendations for Transverse Loading

⚠
Watch Taper Angles: When designing lugs for transverse loads, avoid large taper angles ($\beta > 15^\circ$) on the side toward the transverse load. Aggressive tapers dramatically reduce $h_1$ and $h_2$, causing $h_{avg}$ to plummet and reducing allowable transverse load by 40% or more.

Calculate Lug Margins of Safety Online

Apply AFFDL-TR-69-42 Chapter 9 analysis with real-time geometry diagrams, digitized curve interpolation, and pin-clevis checks.